Up to 50% Lower Switch Cost
Up to 4x Less Switching Loss
Up to 8x Lower Temperature Rise
Up to 75% Smaller Inductor
Up to 1% Increase in Efficiency
Up to 9x Lower EMI Noise
The advantages of ICERGi technologies are clear when compared to conventional PFC approaches based on conventional topologies. However, incremental steps in the efficiency are no longer enough and the global trend requires a leap. In order to do this, the industry is adapting the Bridgeless Totem-Pole PFC topology. Unfortunately, Bridgeless Totem-Pole is a hard-switched topology and Superjunction MOSFETs are not suited for this task. This is where GaN comes in, with the promise of very low ON resistance (further boost in efficiency) and much faster switching frequency (allow using smaller inductor).
ICERGi PFC designs use MOSFETs in a 5x6mm SMD package. This is an industry standard package and many transistors from various manufacturers are available for multisourcing. GaN Systems Inc. produce GaN FETs in a 5x6mm SMD package and therefore have been selected for a like-to-like comparison with ICERGi.
1kW Totem-Pole PFC | ICERGi 65kHz Si |
65kHz GaN | 260kHz GaN |
---|---|---|---|
Switches | 28mR 150V MOSFET TPH3300CNH |
100mR 650V GaN GS66504B |
100mR 650V GaN GS66504B |
Inductor Volt-Seconds | 768Vµs | 3072Vµs | 768Vµs |
Relative Inductor Size | 0.25x | 1x | 0.25x |
Switching Loss | 4W | 3.2W | 12.8W* |
Core Loss | 0.4W | 0.8W | 0.6W |
Conduction Loss | 7.69W | 7.9W | 7.69W |
Control & Drive Power | 0.7W | 0.5W | 1W |
Total Loss | 12.79W | 12.4W | 22.09W |
Efficiency | 98.73% | 98.77% | 97.83% |
A lot of messages about GaN mention increase in efficiency and increase in switching frequency (reduced inductor size) which may lead people to believe that both hold true for any scenario. However, the loss breakdown reveals that in a hard-switched topology these advantages do not come together. ICERGi design overcomes this and offers highest efficiency together with reduced inductor size.
1kW Totem-Pole PFC | ICERGi 65kHz Si |
65kHz GaN | 260kHz GaN |
---|---|---|---|
Fundamental (First) harmonic as dictated by inductor frequency | 130kHz | 65kHz | 260kHz |
Main noise component that needs to be dealt with for EMI standard | 360kHz (Third harmonic) |
195kHz (Third harmonic) |
260kHz (First harmonic) |
Fourier theory states that the amplitudes of the harmonics are reversely proportional to square of the harmonic order. This means that the third harmonic will be 9 times smaller than the first (fundamental) harmonic.**
** B. Lu, W. Dong, S. Wang and F. C. Lee, "High frequency investigation of single-switch CCM power factor correction converter," Nineteenth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, 2004. APEC '04., Anaheim, CA, USA, 2004, pp. 1481-1487 Vol.3.
260kHz implementation will face significant EMI challenges because the first harmonic has to be suppressed. This will result in a complex and costly EMI filter. This observation applies to any conventional design with switching frequency above 150kHz.
ICERGi Si implementation has two significant EMI advantages:
It is much easier to filter out 390kHz noise as compared to 195kHz or even 260kHz.
Third harmonic has 9 times lower amplitude than the fundamental harmonic.
1kW Totem-Pole PFC | ICERGi 65kHz Si |
65kHz GaN | 260kHz GaN |
---|---|---|---|
Modulation | 65kHz PWM Variable duty ratio |
65kHz PWM Variable duty ratio |
260kHz PWM Variable duty ratio |
Sampling frequency | 65kHz | 65kHz | 260kHz |
Minimum ON time (Duty ration=0.05) |
800ns | 800ns | 200ns |
Drive requirements | 8 x ICERGi proprietary low-cost drive | 2 x High-performance floating drive | 2 x High-performance floating drive |
Current sensing | Low-side resistor & Low-cost Op-Amp |
High-side resistor & High-Performance Isolated Op-Amp |
High-side resistor & High-Performance Isolated Op-Amp |
Digital Control Hardware Demand | Low cost Proprietary control algorithm with multi-mode operation |
Comparable cost | Higher cost High sampling frequency and fast control loop |
Aside from reduced cost of current sensing, ICERGi has implemented a cycle-by-cycle control on a low cost, low memory variant of an ARM® Cortex™-M0 microcontroller. An M0 is limited to 48MHz operation and in order to implement similar control strategy on a GaN converter running 4x faster switching frequency one would have to upgrade to a much faster microcontroller. Some industry examples use a much more expensive Cortex™-M4. An M4 comes with a many advanced peripherals and lots of memory, all of which are not necessary and were never intended for SMPS applications. So if one needs a faster core, one must bear the extra cost of all the unnecessary functionality too.
1kW Totem-Pole PFC | ICERGi 65kHz Si |
65kHz GaN | 260kHz GaN |
---|---|---|---|
Switches | 8 x 150V MOSFETs in 5x6mm SMD |
2 x 650V GaNFETs in 5x6mm SMD |
2 x 650V GaNFETs in 5x6mm SMD |
Total loss in power switches | 7.4W | 6.3W | 15.9W |
Loss per switch | 0.925W | 3.15W | 15.9W |
Relative Thermal Impedance*** (Device junction to heatsink) |
1x | 1x | 1x |
Relative Component Temperature Rise (Difference between device junction and heatsink) |
1x | 3.4x | 8.59x |
ICERGi Si implementation enables significantly cooler operation of power switches resulting in various benefits such as:
Longer life span
Higher reliability
Capability to handle higher power - lower cost per Watt
Easier thermal management
Improved convection-cooled performance
It is worth noting that this could be a much worse scenario for GaN implementations because other manufacturers use much, much smaller packaging which results in very low surface area and multiple times higher thermal impedance, making it very difficult to keep the switching devices cool.